SERIES · Disaster preparedness notes
Building in stream beds: how regulation reads the map
Circular 2010/5 put structures in stream beds under DSİ review; a 2016 regulation defined flood hazard and flood risk maps. Distance does not replace those maps — it asks their question.
IN SHORT
- 01Prime Ministry Circular 2010/5 provided for DSİ to review existing structures on streams against flood protection criteria.
- 02The flood management plans regulation defines flood hazard maps and flood risk maps separately; plans are updated every six years.
- 03Distance to a stream line does not replace official flood maps; it is useful as a first screening that asks which buildings to look at first.
What the circular says
Prime Ministry Circular 2010/5, published in the Official Gazette of 20 February 2010 (No. 27499), called for rivers and stream beds to be rehabilitated quickly, citing changes in rainfall linked to global climate change and the flood disasters caused by frequent floods in recent years. For how the circular applies today and for later regulations, the current legislation of the relevant institutions should be consulted.
Under the circular, existing structures on streams were to be surveyed and reviewed by DSİ against flood protection criteria, with removal of non-compliant structures handled under the responsibility and coordination of provincial governors. For stream works carried out by metropolitan municipalities, DSİ’s opinion was to be obtained at the planning stage.
Hazard maps and risk maps are different things
The Regulation on the Preparation, Implementation and Monitoring of Flood Management Plans, published in the Official Gazette of 12 May 2016 (No. 29710), defines two maps separately:
- Flood hazard map: shows, for a given discharge, the area that would be under water in a flood, the water level or depth, and the flow velocity or discharge.
- Flood risk map: shows the adverse effects of a flood, the population likely to be affected, economic activities, installations that could cause pollution, and protected areas likely to be affected.
Under the regulation, flood management plans are published by the Ministry and updated every six years — or sooner in unforeseen extraordinary circumstances.
Photo: Sergej (@skstrannik) · Unsplash License
Distance opens a question
In our view, distance bands such as 25, 50 and 100 metres from a stream line belong before the official maps, not instead of them: a first screening that asks which buildings to look at first. A single line splits the map in two; bands make the gradient visible.
“A single line splits the map in two; reality comes in steps.”
What this article does not say
- It does not state the risk of a single building; no building-level verdicts.
- A distance band is not a legal boundary and does not stand in for zoning decisions.
- It is not a flood forecast and does not replace official flood hazard and risk maps.
Sources
Disaster preparedness notes
2 / 2
- 1Is the assembly area big enough? First look at who decides, and by what measureOctober 10, 2026
- 2Building in stream beds: how regulation reads the mapYOU ARE READING
This article has been prepared for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, technical or other professional advice. Legislative and technical information reflects the position as at the date of publication. Short extracts may be quoted provided that the source is cited and a link to the article is given; publication of the article in full or of a substantial part of it is subject to written permission. Terms of use